Has fan LOVE turned 765874: UNIFICATION into an “OPEN SOURCE” fan film?

Sometimes a fan filmmaker produces a fan film that inspires a completely different fan filmmaker to produce something—be it a tribute, continuation, or some other expansion of the original—based in whole or in part on the original work. This has come to be known as “a fan film of a fan film.”

The term was first coined in 2016 with the release of PRELUDE TO AX’D -WE-ARE, the STALLED TREK animated puppet parody of both PRELUDE TO AXANAR and the subsequent copyright infringement lawsuit filed jointly by CBS and Paramount against AXANAR PRODUCTIONS and ALEC PETERS.

Granted, such projects are very rare. Indeed, only INTERLUDE, THE ICARUS MANEUVER, and THE FEDERATION FILES‘ “The Equinox Effect” and “Friends and Foes” come to mind for me. And the former two were more expansions of an existing fan film “universe” of characters and settings, and the latter two were GLEN L. WOLFE’s attempt to complete unfinished fan films so their partial footage could finally be released for fans to see.

All of this is to say that there aren’t many “fan films of fan films” in the Star Trek genre. But over this past weekend, we got our newest entry: PROLOGUE TO UNIFICATION from SAMUEL COCKINGS of Great Britain, the showrunner behind the TREK SHORTS fanthology series of fan films. As the title suggests, this release is meant to lead into the recent 765874: UNIFICATION from OTOY with involvement from WILLIAM SHATNER, the estate of LEONARD NIMOY, and THE RODDENBERRY ARCHIVE. In case you’re one of the four Trek fans on the planet who hasn’t seen this jaw-dropping, cutting-edge love letter to Star Trek yet, watch it now…

And now, take a look at what Sam Cockings was able to put together in the span of just three weeks based on OTOY’s fan film…

Oh! Before I go on, I need to make a disclaimer about my use of the term “fan film.” Technically, 765874: Unification isn’t a standard fan film. It was an approved production, licensed by Paramount Global to OTOY as a way of generating original Star Trek content for the new Apple Vision Pro VR headset. So calling 765874: Unification a “fan film” isn’t entirely accurate. On the other hand, it was not produced by either Paramount or CBS Studios…and it was obviously made by fans with a knowledge of and loyalty to long-established Star Trek canon.

So what is it? Much like the “uncanny valley” in early CG renderings of human faces (like Princess Leia at the end of Star Wars: Rogue One), 765874: Unification walks in two worlds without truly fitting into either. So rather than calling Sam’s latest project a “fan film of a licensed-non-studio-produced-but-still professional-quality-Star-Trek-vignette-CGI-film-made-by-fans-with-fans-in-mind,” I’m going to call it a “fan film of a fan film.” Feel free to argue.

Continue reading “Has fan LOVE turned 765874: UNIFICATION into an “OPEN SOURCE” fan film?”

So you’ve seen 765874: UNIFICATION…but what did it MEAN???

By now, a vast swath of Star Trek fans have viewed the new A.I.-enhanced “fan film” 765874: UNIFICATION released by OTOY, THE RODDENBERRY ARCHIVE, WILLIAM SHATNER, and the LEONARD NIMOY estate. It’s already had half a million views in just two and a half days. If you haven’t seen it yet, take a look…

Timed to coincide with the 30th anniversary of the 1994 release of Star Trek Generations, 765874: Unification premiered at the Star Trek Original Series Set Tour in Ticonderoga, NY with WILLIAM (Kirk) SHATNER and ROBIN (Saavik) CURTIS both in attendance. Also present were LAWRENCE SELLECK, who is the stand-in for the A.I.-generated Spock, and MAHÉ THAISSA, who is the stand-in for J.M. Colt from the first TOS pilot, “The Cage.”

For more information on the making of this ambitious production, there is a wonderful article on TrekMovie.com based on information presented on the OTOY website. So I won’t get too into the weeds today discussing how they did it (although I have reached out to OTOY to try to get an interview with someone involved in the project). Instead, I’m going to look at the content of the film itself.

Fan reaction has generally been extremely positive with a few complainers here and there. If nothing else, the quality of the A.I. on both Kirk and Spock (as well as Gary Mitchell) is pretty spectacular, and the musical score by MICHAEL GIACCHINO (recorded at the famed Abbey Road Studios in London) is flawless and emotionally mesmerizing. The costumes, props, make-up, and green screen compositing are all amazing, and it’s obvious that no expense was spared in creating this content that OTOY will be using to demonstrate what their cutting-edge technology can do.

But amidst all the “I had tears in my eyes!” and “This was so beautiful!” plaudits posted to social media were a fair amount of “What the heck was that???” comments from the head-scratchers…which, admittedly, included myself. With only one piece of dialog (an original re-recording of Kirk’s final log from Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan) the rest of the presentation was essentially silent but for the music. Indeed, I got a very 2001: A Space Oddessey feeling of déjà vu. And just as sci-fi fans are generally confounded trying to figure out what was going on with Dave Bowman at the end of STANLEY KUBRICK’s 1968 masterpiece (I think he was mirroring the evolution of man himself), Trekkers are being left to their own devices to interpret 765874: Unification.

Having now read a wide range of postings on social media, I think I can clear up at least a few things about this film. Some items I’ll be sharing are straight-up facts and pieces of established Star Trek canon. Others require a little more open-mindedness about things that may or may not be canon. And then, of course, I’ve got some theories that could be right or wrong…and we may just never know for certain.

Okay, you ready…?

Continue reading “So you’ve seen 765874: UNIFICATION…but what did it MEAN???”