It’s a strong word, and it’s one I don’t like to use on this blog if I can avoid it. It implies both intent to mislead as well as the act itself. It’s not a nice thing to do, nor is it a nice thing to accuse someone else of doing.
As far as ALEC PETERS is concerned, CARLOS PEDRAZA (the “journalist” who writes the obsessively hyper-critical Axamonitor blogs) is an outright liar when it comes to all things AXANAR. Alec has often asked me why I don’t call Carlos out on his lies here in this blog…especially when they are so obvious.
Not so fast, Alec.
It’s not that cut and dried for me. I draw a distinction between lying and simply bad journalism. For example, when Carlos mistakenly reported the wrong location for the new Georgia studio for Axanar Productions, that wasn’t knowingly a lie. Carlos had been fed bad information, rushed to publish it before confirming his facts, and was later called out on it. To me, that was not lying; it was simply sloppy reporting. And to his credit, Carlos was quick to correct the misinformation and apologize.
And as I commented here in a recent editorial, Carlos is renown for reporting only PART of the facts and leaving out almost anything that works against his primary goal of discrediting Axanar. For example, take a look at this screen cap from a blog Carlos wrote on September 5, 2017…
Notice that Carlos says “…all of which was spent without a single frame of Axanar shot in the studio.” Makes it sound like nothing was produced at all, right? Of course, the 3-minute Vulcan scene—the thing that reportedly got Axanar Productions sued—was shot outside of the studio in the parking lot, NOT inside. See what Carlos did there? Clever!
But reporting only half the truth with the intent to mislead is still not technically lying…even though Carlos does it a lot.
CORRECTION – In the original version of this article, I wrote that while Carlos claimed to have worked for the Associated Press, I had only been able to find one, single fluff piece article from 29 years ago. However, a more extensive online search revealed additional articles, and I would like to correct the record and state that Carlos Pedraza was employed with the AP from July of 1985 until June of 1987.
So by sharing some facts but leaving out certain others, Carlos can “color” the truth. But now it seems to me that Carlos Pedraza may have finally crossed that line between bad journalism and outright lying. Read on and decide for yourself…
Continue reading “Is CARLOS PEDRAZA a liar or just a lousy journalist? (editorial)”